Opinion: No blanket exemption for email on personal account
From the
PNA Legal
Hotline
By Teri
Henning, General Counsel
and Melissa Melewsky, Media Law Counsel
Pennsylvania
Newspaper Association
Q: I requested access to e-mails sent between
council members and the mayor of a local agency.
The agency denied my request on the basis that
the agency does not provide e-mail accounts to
council or the mayor, and the e-mails are sent
from personal e-mail addresses. Can they do that?
A: No. Any blanket denial for these types of
e-mails is contrary to the language and intent of
the Right to Know Law. If the e-mails document or
relate to agency transactions or business, they
are agency records subject to access pursuant to
the Right to Know Law.
The definition of “record” in the Right to Know
Law is very broad and includes information that
documents a transaction or activity of an agency
and that is created, received or retained
pursuant to law or in connection with a
transaction, business or activity of an agency.
If the content of the e-mails deal with agency
business, the agency has the burden make them
public, subject to any applicable exemptions in
the law.
For instance, section 708(b)(6) of the law allows
agencies to redact personal email addresses from
public records. In this case, the personal email
addresses of council members and the mayor may be
redacted but the content of emails that deal with
government business, if otherwise public records,
must be produced.
If the agency does not offer public e-mail
accounts to council members and the mayor, agency
policy should be very clear that any government
business transacted or relating to agency
business on personal property is subject to
public access via the Right to Know Law. The
public will be denied accountability and the
intent of the Law would be thwarted if government
agencies could avoid providing public records by
instructing or allowing government employees to
use personal communication equipment to conduct
government business.
The Pennsylvania Office of Open Records has ruled
on this issue several times and always in favor
of access. Visit the following links to read the
Office of Open Records’ Final Determinations
related to this issue:
- MacNeal vs. York Township AP 2009-0633
-
Bowders
vs. York Township AP 2009-0087
▪ Mollick vs. Worcester Township AP 2009-0042