Opinion: Sunshine Act penalties infrequently imposed
From the
PNA Legal
Hotline
By Teri
Henning, General Counsel
and Melissa Melewsky, Media Law Counsel
Pennsylvania
Newspaper
Association
Q: Our newspaper would like to
pursue legal action against a local agency for
Sunshine Act violations. Are there civil or
criminal penalties for violating the act?
A: Both criminal and civil penalties are
available under the Sunshine Act, but neither are
frequently imposed by the courts.
It is a summary offense to intentionally violate
the Sunshine Act, punishable by up to a $100 fine
plus court costs. In order to pursue criminal
charges, a newspaper may file a private criminal
complaint alleging a violation of the Sunshine
Act. The procedure for filing a private criminal
complaint differs throughout the state but in
most counties, the District Attorney and the
Magisterial District Judges have complaint forms
available to the public. In many counties, the
District Attorney’s Office will review the
complaint and decide whether criminal charges are
warranted. You do not need an attorney to file a
private criminal complaint, but it is always
advisable to keep your newspaper’s attorney
informed.
The Sunshine Act also permits civil remedies.
These are more common, but still relatively rare.
If a violation is shown, a court may invalidate
any official action taken in violation of the
Sunshine Act. It may also grant an injunction or
fashion other appropriate relief to prevent
future violations. In order to pursue civil
remedies, a newspaper must file a civil lawsuit
in the Court of Common Pleas in the applicable
county.
Newspapers should be aware that the courts have
allowed agencies to “cure” certain violations.
Under the Sunshine Act, courts have found that
agencies can do this by advertising and holding
an open meeting, allowing public comment prior to
re-voting, and then ratifying a prior action. It
is not clear that “curing” works in all
situations, but there are a number of cases in
which the courts have allowed it.
In addition to criminal and civil remedies,
section 710.1 of the Act allows the public to
object formally to a perceived violation of the
Sunshine Act at any time during a public meeting.
Any such objection should be noted in the
agency’s minutes. Please see PNA’s template for
making a formal objection during a public
meeting. [Reprinted below]
Finally, the law requires that legal action
alleging a violation of the Sunshine Act must be
filed within 30 days of a violation that occurred
at an open meeting and 30 days from discovery of
a violation that occurred at a closed meeting. In
no event may an action be brought more than one
year from the date of the alleged violation
(regardless of whether the meeting was
closed).
Objecting to a Closed Meeting
WHAT TO DO WHEN A MEETING IS CLOSED
Provided by the PENNSYLVANIA NEWSPAPER ASSOCIATION
(Mr. Or Madame Chairman): My name is _______________. I protest the closing of this meeting, as the reason you have listed for closing the meeting does not meet the provisions of Pennsylvania's Open Meeting Law. I ask that you reconsider your intent to discuss this matter in executive session. I further ask that this protest be recorded in the official minutes of the meeting, as required by law.
Pennsylvania Newspaper Association attorneys provide member newspapers with advice on government access issues.