Vol. fire companies
Denied: Additional accident records that fire co. swears do not exist
July 30, 2009
Denied: Records from the
Tunkhannock Township Fire Company relating to a
specific fatal vehicle accident. Read
More...
Granted: Request that township ignored for more than 30 days
June 05, 2009
Granted: A request to McNett
Township seeking minutes, budget proposal,
invoices, letters, local laws and bylaws of a
fire company. The Office of Open Records noted in
its response to the appeal that there was no
evidence that the township ever responded to the
request. Read
More...
Granted: Fire company records, despite FD's decision to wait for another case's court appeal
May 22, 2009
Granted: A request for the
Bonneauville Community Fire Department's meeting
minutes, bylaws, guidelines, building access logs
and responder response statistics. The fire
company had denied the request on the basis that
it would not release any records pending the
outcome of a similar RTKL case appealed to Tioga
County court. Read
More...
Granted: Financial and driver information from L&L Fire Co.
April 23, 2009
Granted: Access to financial and
vehicle driver information from the L&L Fire
Company of Weatherly. The request had been denied
based on lack of specificity and the argument
that volunteer fire companies need only provide
financial information in response to Right to
Know requests. Read
More...
Granted: Volunteer fire company meeting minutes
April 20, 2009
Granted in part and denied in
part: A request for the Frystown (Bethel
Township) volunteer fire company's meeting
minutes from April 1996 through present. The fire
company had denied the request, saying it is not
subject to the Right to Know Law. Read
More...
Granted: Access to records of fire company as a local agency
April 03, 2009
Granted in part and denied in
part: A request to Morris Township and
the Morris Township Fire Company for five types
of documents related to the operation of the fire
company. The township had denied the request
based on non-possession, and the fire company had
denied access by saying it was not subject to the
Right to Know Law. Read
More...